資源描述:
《基于人體動靜態(tài)平衡的兒童連身褲結(jié)構(gòu)分析》由會員上傳分享,免費在線閱讀,更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在行業(yè)資料-天天文庫。
1、Astudyofthestructureofkid,Srompers——basedonthebalanceofstaticanddynamicfeaturesAbstractApparelishuman.oriented.Therefore.itsdesignandstructuremustaccordtothefeaturesofphysicalbody,themovingfunctions,andthedemandforcomfort.Amongalltheappareltypes,rompers,breakingup
2、thenormaldesignwithindependenttopsandpants.caterforthemodemdemandsforfashionandindividuation.Kid’Srompers,duetothecharacteristicsofcomfortandsafetyarepopularwithparentsandchildren.Theyarenotonlysuitableforchildren’Sspecialphysicalshapesbutalsofitforsports.Theyarev
3、erypracticalforchildrenwouldnotcatchcoldsbecauseofthebarebellywhentheuppergarmentsareliftwhileplaying.However,thereislittleresearchonthestructuraldesignofchildren’Srompers.Becauseofthis,thisPaperconductsthestudyonthestructureofchildren’Srompersbasedonthedynamicand
4、staticbalanceofhumanbodV.Thegeneralrulesofthestructuraldesignofkids’rompersstructuraldesignareconcluded.Themainachievementsofthisstudyareasfollows:Firstly,thedynamicandstaticmeasuringexperimentsarecarriedoutaccordingtotherelationshipbetweenthecharacteristicsofchil
5、d’Sphysicalbodyandthestructureofrompers,usingsurfacedepictionlinemethod.Withthat,therelationshipsareconcludedbetweenthechangingrateofskinstretchingandthe100semeasuresofrompers.whichprovidesthescientificreferencesforthescopeof100semeasureofeachpartoftherompers.Seco
6、ndly,basedontheresultsoftheexperiments,thestructuralparametersandbasicpaperpattemsofsamplerompersaregiven.Withthat,thedesignofsampleswimdifferentstructuralparametersiSconductedand29expefimentalsamplesarecreated.Lateron,wearingtrailsofthesamplesarecarriedout.Meanwh
7、ile,thesubjectiveevaluationsaremadeonthestaticappearanceanddynamiccomfortwiththeestablishedsubjectiveevaluationsystem.Thirdly,accordingtotheevaluationresults.theevaluatingindicatorsaresortedoutwiththemethodofclusteranalysisandgiveeightcanonicalindicators.Then.base
8、donafactoranalysisandclusteranalysis.the29samplesaredividedintotwomaintypes:reasonableandunreasonabletype.Moreover,thereasonabletypewasfurtherdividedtot