資源描述：
《論醫(yī)療損害責(zé)任的歸責(zé)原則》由會(huì)員上傳分享，免費(fèi)在線閱讀，更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在學(xué)術(shù)論文-天天文庫。
1、中文摘要近些來來，人們逐漸意識(shí)到維護(hù)權(quán)利的重要性。在出現(xiàn)醫(yī)療糾紛時(shí)，往往希望通過法律的手段來保護(hù)自己。然而，實(shí)踐過程中，司法機(jī)關(guān)處理醫(yī)療糾紛案件時(shí)，適用的法律依據(jù)是相當(dāng)混亂的，同時(shí)普遍存在著爭(zhēng)議。在《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》實(shí)施之前，處理醫(yī)療損害賠償案件的主要依據(jù)是《民法通則》和《醫(yī)療事故處理?xiàng)l例》，形成了二元化的糾紛解決機(jī)制。這種法律適用上的二元化局面，造成了人們對(duì)醫(yī)療糾紛認(rèn)識(shí)上的混亂，消弱了我國(guó)司法機(jī)關(guān)裁判的權(quán)威。2010年7月1日《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》正式實(shí)施，而此次侵權(quán)法以專章的形式規(guī)定了醫(yī)療損害責(zé)任。試圖結(jié)束醫(yī)療損害賠償案件長(zhǎng)期存在法律適用上的二元化局面，這無疑是巨大的進(jìn)步。然而，《侵權(quán)
2、責(zé)任法》關(guān)于醫(yī)療損害責(zé)任歸責(zé)原則的規(guī)定仍然不是十分完善的。本文以《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》中醫(yī)療損害責(zé)任的基本理論為出發(fā)點(diǎn)，深入分析我國(guó)醫(yī)療損害責(zé)任的歸責(zé)原則，同時(shí)借鑒各國(guó)立法與實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)之上，就完善醫(yī)療損害責(zé)任的歸責(zé)原則體系提出了個(gè)人的一些建議?？梢愿玫奶幚砗冕t(yī)患之間的矛盾，最大化的平衡雙方的利益，對(duì)和諧醫(yī)患關(guān)系的構(gòu)建有著重要的意義。關(guān)鍵詞：醫(yī)療損害責(zé)任；歸責(zé)原則；法律適用黑龍江大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文AbstractlIllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllLIIIIY2323899Inrecentyears，peopleincreasinglyrealizethe
3、importanceofrightsprotection．Whenmedicaldisputeoccurs，peoplealwayshopetoprotectthemselvesbylaw．However,medicaldisputecasesweredealtwithconfusedlegalbasisbyjudicialauthorityinpractice，whichwerethoughtcontroversial．BeforetheTortLiabilityLawputintoeffect，themainbasisdealingwithmedicaldamagecase
4、sweretheGeneralRulesofCivilLawandtheMedicalMalpracticeManagementRegulation，whichcontributedtothedualisticdisputesettlementmechanism．Thedualisticsituationcausedtheconfusiontomedicaldispute，whichweakenedtheauthorityofjudicialadjudication．OnJuly1st．2010，theTortLiabilityLawputintoeffectformally,
5、anditregulatedmedicalliabilityfordamageinaverychapter,whichtryingtoendthedualisticdisputesettlementmechanisminmedicaldamagecases，anditisnodoubtasignificantprogress．However,theTortLiabilityLawisstillimperfectioninthearbitrationprinciplesofmedicalliabilityfordamage．Thearticlestartedwiththebasi
6、ctheoryofmedicalliabilityfordamageintheTortLiabilityLaw,andanalyzedthearbitrationprinciplesofmedicalliabilityfordamageinourcountry．Basingontheexperienceoflegislationandpracticeinothercountries，theauthorpersonallymadesomesuggestionsonthearbitrationprinciplesofmedicalliabilityfordamage．whichwo
7、uldhandlethedoctor-patientcontradictionbetter,balancetheirprofitsmaximization，andmakeagreatsignificanceinbuildingaharmoniousdoctor-patientrelationship。Keywords：MedicalLiabilityforDamage；ThePrincipleofImputation；TheApplicationofLaw目錄中文摘要????????????
