資源描述:
《超聲引導(dǎo)下細(xì)針穿刺抽吸活檢診斷甲狀腺結(jié)節(jié).pdf》由會(huì)員上傳分享,免費(fèi)在線閱讀,更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在行業(yè)資料-天天文庫(kù)。
1、中國(guó)介入影像與治療學(xué)2013年第1O卷第8期ChinJIntervImagingTher,2013,Vol10,No8Ultrasoundguidedfine-needleaspirationbiopsyindiagnosisofthyroidnodulesNIXiao—feng,ZHANWei—wei,SONGLin—lin,HUYun—yun,YAOJie-jie,ZHOUWei(DepartmentofUltrasound,RuijinHospital,ShanghaiJiaoTongUniversitySchoolofMedicine,S
2、hanghai200025,China)[-Abstract]0bjectiveToobservethevalueofultrasound—guidedfine-needleaspirationbiopsy(US-FNAB)indifferentialdiagnosisofthyroidnoduleswithdifferentsizes.MethodsDatawerecollectedfrom689consecutivepatientswith736thy—roidnoduleswhounderwentthyroidUS-FNAB.Themaxi
3、mumsizeofnodulewasmeasuredbyultrasound,andthenoduleswereclassifiedas5mm,5—1Ommand>10mmgroups.Theresultsofcytologicdiagnosiswerecomparedwiththepathologicalandclinicalfollow-upfindings,andthedifferencesfornoduleswithdifferentsizewereanalyzed.ResultsA—mong736thyroidnodulesdiagno
4、sedbycytology,132weremalignant,61weresuspiciousformalignancy,476werebe—nign,44wereunsatisfactory,and23wereundetermined.Actuallytherewere208malignantand528benignnodulescon—firmedbypathologicalandclinicalfollow-upresults.Themalignantnodulesweresmallerinsizethanthebenignones(P<0
5、.001).Cytologicpositiverateandactuallymalignantrateofthenodulesin5—1OmmgroupwerehigherthanthoseintheothertWOgroups.Cytologycouldefficientlydistinguishmalignantfrombenignthyroidnodules,anditssensitivity,speci—ficityandaccuracywas87.02(181/208),97.73(516/528)and94.70(697/736),r
6、espectively.Therewasnodifferenceofdiagnosticvaluebetweenthethreegroups(P>O.05).ConclusionUS-FNABisusefulfordiagnosingthyroidnodules,andhassimilardiagnosticvaluefornoduleswithdifferentsizes.[Keywords]Biopsy,fine-needle;Thyroidnodule;u1trasonography超聲引導(dǎo)下細(xì)針穿刺抽吸活檢診斷甲狀腺結(jié)節(jié)倪曉楓,詹維偉,宋
7、琳琳,胡贅贅,姚潔潔,周偉(Az海交通大學(xué)醫(yī)學(xué)院附屬瑞金醫(yī)院超聲科,上海200025)[摘要]目的探討超聲引導(dǎo)下細(xì)針穿刺抽吸活檢(US-FNAB)對(duì)不同大小甲狀腺結(jié)節(jié)的診斷價(jià)值。方法回顧分析在我院接受US-FNAB檢查的689例患者736個(gè)甲狀腺結(jié)節(jié),超聲測(cè)量結(jié)節(jié)最大徑,并將其分為<5mm、5~10mm、>10mm組;對(duì)結(jié)節(jié)US-FNAB細(xì)胞學(xué)診斷結(jié)果與術(shù)后病理結(jié)果或隨訪結(jié)果進(jìn)行比較,分析組間差異。結(jié)果736個(gè)結(jié)節(jié)中,細(xì)胞學(xué)診斷惡性132個(gè),可疑惡性61個(gè),良性476個(gè),不滿意44個(gè),不確定23個(gè)。經(jīng)術(shù)后病理或臨床隨訪,惡性結(jié)節(jié)208個(gè),良性結(jié)節(jié)
8、528個(gè)。惡性結(jié)節(jié)最大徑小于良性結(jié)節(jié)(P10mm組(P均