資源描述：
《historical materialism today an interview with anthony giddens外語英文電子書》由會員上傳分享，免費在線閱讀，更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在教育資源-天天文庫。
1、Theory,Culture&Societyhttp://tcs.sagepub.comHistoricalMaterialismToday:AnInterviewwithAnthonyGiddensJosefBleicherandMikeFeatherstoneTheoryCultureSociety1982;1;63DOI:10.1177/026327648200100206Theonlineversionofthisarticlecanbefoundat:http://tcs.sagepub.comPubl
2、ishedby:http://www.sagepublications.comOnbehalfof:TheTCSCentre,NottinghamTrentUniversityAdditionalservicesandinformationforTheory,Culture&Societycanbefoundat:EmailAlerts:http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/alertsSubscriptions:http://tcs.sagepub.com/subscriptionsReprin
3、ts:http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.navPermissions:http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.navDownloadedfromhttp://tcs.sagepub.combymarcinwiatrówonNovember11,2007?1982Theory,Culture&SocietyLtd..Allrightsreserved.Notforcommercialuseorunauthorizeddist
4、ribution.SymposiumonGiddensHistoricalMaterialismToday:AnInterviewwithAnthonyGiddens*JosefBleicher&MikeFeatherstoneQPerhapswecanstartwithageneralquestion.Howdoyouseethestatusofhistoricalmaterialismtoday?Aretherecorefeaturesyouwouldwishtoretainordoyouthinkitsho
5、uldberadicallyrevised?ATherearethreethingsIwouldliketoIdentifyhere.Oneisthat,IfhistoricalmaterialismmeansanythingclosetowhatMarxseemedtomeanbyhismaterialistconceptionofhistory,asforexamplesetoutinsayGermanIdeologyorCommunistManifestoorPrefacetoaContributionto
6、aCritiqueofPoliticalEconomy,Ifthosearethethreeclassicalsourcesofmaterialistconceptionofhistory,andIfMarx’sclassificationofthevarioustypesofsocietyispartofthematerialistconceptionofhistory,thenIthinkmostofthatreallyhastoberejectedinthelightofmorerecentarchaeol
7、ogicalandanthropologicalwork.Mostofthebasicnotionssimplydon’twork.Ifhistoricalmaterialismmeansamoregeneric,vaguerconceptionofmethod,somethingtodowithageneralisednotionofpraxisthenIthinkit’smoredefensible.ButifitmeanswhatItakeIttomean,somethinglikeanevolutiona
8、ryschemeofsomesort,inwhichthereIsagenerictypeofmechanismatwork,namelyclassstruggle,thenitIsanobsoleteconception.Itdoesn’treallyprovideakeytohistoryanditcan’treallybedefended.WhatI’mtrying
