the sins of ecological validity - kent state university 肯特州立大學生態(tài)效度的罪

the sins of ecological validity - kent state university 肯特州立大學生態(tài)效度的罪

ID:9292147

大?。?0.00 KB

頁數(shù):26頁

時間:2018-04-26

the sins of ecological validity - kent state university 肯特州立大學生態(tài)效度的罪_第1頁
the sins of ecological validity - kent state university 肯特州立大學生態(tài)效度的罪_第2頁
the sins of ecological validity - kent state university 肯特州立大學生態(tài)效度的罪_第3頁
the sins of ecological validity - kent state university 肯特州立大學生態(tài)效度的罪_第4頁
the sins of ecological validity - kent state university 肯特州立大學生態(tài)效度的罪_第5頁
資源描述:

《the sins of ecological validity - kent state university 肯特州立大學生態(tài)效度的罪》由會員上傳分享,免費在線閱讀,更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在教育資源-天天文庫。

1、RepresentativeDesign26SinsCommittedintheNameofEcologicalValidity:ACallforRepresentativeDesigninEducationScienceJohnDunlosky1,SaraBottiroli2,andMarissaHartwig11KentStateUniversity2UniversityofPaviaRunninghead:RepresentativedesignInpress,HandbookofMetacognitioninEducation.D.Hacker,J.D

2、unlosky,&A.Graesser(Eds).NY:PsychologyPress.RepresentativeDesign26SinsCommittedintheNameofEcologicalValidity:ACallforRepresentativeDesigninEducationScienceDoyouwantconclusionsandfindingsfromeducationresearchtogeneralizetoreal-worldeducation,wherestudentsaretaught,learn,andaretested?

3、Incritiquingeducationresearch,areyouconcernedwhenitisnotecologicallyvalid?Mostofuswouldanswer“yes”tobothofthesequestions.Evenifwebelievethatbroadgeneralizabilitymaynotbefeasibleinanyoneexperiment,conducting“ecologicallyvalid”researchisnodoubtanidealtowhichwestillstrive.Inthepresentc

4、hapter,weagreethatgeneralizabilityisessential,butwedeconstructecologicalvalidityandarguethatthetermisoftenmisusedandmisrepresentedinamannerthatmayultimatelystiflethedevelopmentofmethodsforachievinggeneralizability.Forthoseofyouwhoansweredbothquestionswitharesounding“yes,”andtheprese

5、ntauthorscertainlyhavedoneso,wemustemphasizethatourgoalisnottounderminetheidealofvalidity–everysocialscientist’sdesireistoconductresearchthatisgeneralizabletoatargetecology.Indeed,wemeantoholdthisidealwiththehighestregard,andbydoingso,wewillrevealthesinscommittedinthenameofecologica

6、lvalidityandthepromiseofresearchprogramsthatareinformedbyrepresentativedesign.Bynomeansarewethefirsttocallforthisreformwithinthescientificcommunity–toscrutinizetheuseofthetermecologicalvalidityandtoattendmoredeeplytoissuespertainingtogeneralizability.Otherswhohavemadesuchacallinclud

7、eAraújo,Davids,andPassos(2007),Hammond(1998),Petrinovich(1989),andSchmuckler(2001).AlthougheachoftheseauthorsofferuniqueinsightsaboutRepresentativeDesign26conductingresearchthatwillgeneralize,theyallconvergeonacommontheme:Theconceptofecologicalvalidityisinadequateforguidingthedesign

8、ofresearchthatwillg

當前文檔最多預覽五頁,下載文檔查看全文

此文檔下載收益歸作者所有

當前文檔最多預覽五頁,下載文檔查看全文
溫馨提示:
1. 部分包含數(shù)學公式或PPT動畫的文件,查看預覽時可能會顯示錯亂或異常,文件下載后無此問題,請放心下載。
2. 本文檔由用戶上傳,版權(quán)歸屬用戶,天天文庫負責整理代發(fā)布。如果您對本文檔版權(quán)有爭議請及時聯(lián)系客服。
3. 下載前請仔細閱讀文檔內(nèi)容,確認文檔內(nèi)容符合您的需求后進行下載,若出現(xiàn)內(nèi)容與標題不符可向本站投訴處理。
4. 下載文檔時可能由于網(wǎng)絡波動等原因無法下載或下載錯誤,付費完成后未能成功下載的用戶請聯(lián)系客服處理。