[博弈論書籍].game.theory.and.the.social.contract.vol.1

《[博弈論書籍].game.theory.and.the.social.contract.vol.1》由會(huì)員上傳分享，免費(fèi)在線閱讀，更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在學(xué)術(shù)論文-天天文庫。

1、DocumentPageivThirdprinting,1998?1994MassachusettsInstituteofTechnologyAllrightsreserved.Nopartofthisbookmaybereproducedinanyformbyanyelectronicormechanicalmeans(includingphotocopying,orinformationalstorageandretrieval)withoutpermissioninwritingfromthepublisher.Thisbookwa

2、ssetinComputerModernbyKenBinmore.PrintedandboundintheUnitedStatesofAmerica.LibraryofCongressCataloging-in-PublicationDataBinmore,K.G.,1940-Playingfair:gametheoryandthesocialcontract/KenBinmore.v.cm.Includesbibliographicalreferencesandindex.ISBN0-262-02363-61.Gametheory.2.

3、Socialcontract.3.Politicalscience--Philosophy.I.Title.HB144.B56199493-29610519.3dc20CIPfile:///Z

4、/!/1/0262023636/nlReader.dll@BookID=11343&FileName=iv.html[17.06.200821:31:57]DocumentPagevPlayingFairisdedicatedtomydaughterEmilywhoknowsnootherwaytoplay.file:///Z

5、/!/1/02620

6、23636/nlReader.dll@BookID=11343&FileName=v.html[17.06.200821:31:58]DocumentPageviWilliamBlake'sallegoricalillustrationsarejustlyfamous.Thisshowsayoungauthorawaitingareviewer'sverdictonhispetproject.file:///Z

7、/!/1/0262023636/nlReader.dll@BookID=11343&FileName=vi.html[17.06

8、.200821:31:58]DocumentPageviiimethodasympathybaseduponhisknowledgeofpastsuccessesinvariousoftheempiricalsciences.Insofarasapologiesarenecessaryonthemathematicalcontentofthebook,theyneedtobetenderedtomathematicians,andparticularlytomathematicaleconomists.Asamathematician,I

9、usedtowriteinaveryformalstyle,anditmaybethat,likemanyconverts,Ihaveallowedthependulumtoswingtoofarintheotherdirection.Itiscertainlycorrectthatthetrulyformalpartsofthediscussionareinfrequentandthatthesearepatchedtogetherwithappealstointuitionthatsomemathematicaleconomistsw

10、illfindirritatinglyimprecise.Iftheseappealstointuitionwerecapableofbeingdefendedbyobvious1formalarguments,suchirritationwouldbeunjustified.Butthiswillseldombethecase.Itwillnotevenalwaysbe"obvious"whattheformalsettingforarigorousdiscussionwouldbe.Iagreethattheneedtoreachaw

11、ideraudienceisnotanadequateexcuse.ButIdon'tthinkthisbookwouldhavegotwrittenifIhadtriedtodoabette