資源描述：
《新生兒科護(hù)理風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理對(duì)小兒頭皮靜脈輸液中的應(yīng)用價(jià)值》由會(huì)員上傳分享，免費(fèi)在線閱讀，更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在工程資料-天天文庫(kù)。
1、新生兒科護(hù)理風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理對(duì)小兒頭皮靜脈輸液中的應(yīng)用價(jià)值周秀娟(東?？h人民醫(yī)院新生兒科，江蘇222300)【摘要】目的：探討護(hù)理風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理在對(duì)小兒頭皮靜脈輸液中的應(yīng)用價(jià)值。方法:選取2013年1月?2014年12月間我院收治的352例經(jīng)頭皮靜脈輸液的小兒患者作為研究對(duì)象。將其隨機(jī)分為觀察組和對(duì)照組，每組患兒176例。對(duì)照組患兒行常規(guī)護(hù)理，觀察組患兒在實(shí)施常規(guī)護(hù)理的基礎(chǔ)上，行護(hù)理風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理方案。對(duì)比分析兩組患兒治療效果、風(fēng)險(xiǎn)事件發(fā)生率、患兒及其家屬對(duì)護(hù)理的滿意程度。結(jié)果：觀察組患兒的穿刺成功率99.43%(175/176)明顯高于
2、對(duì)照組88.64(156/176)、固定成功率98.30%(173/176)明顯高于對(duì)照組87.50%(154/176)，二者比較，差異均具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義，P<0.05o觀察組組患兒反復(fù)穿刺率2.84(5/176)明顯低于對(duì)照組10.23%(18/176)、液體滲漏率0.57%(1/176)明顯低于對(duì)照組5.11%(9/176)、針頭脫落率1.70%(3/176)明顯低于對(duì)照組7.95%(14/176),二者比較，差異均具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義，P<0.05。結(jié)論：在小兒頭皮靜脈輸液中應(yīng)用護(hù)理風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理，可以明顯提高穿刺
3、和固定成功率，減少危險(xiǎn)事件的發(fā)生率，并提高護(hù)理滿意度，使患兒及其家屬更易接受?！娟P(guān)鍵詞】護(hù)理風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理；小兒頭皮靜脈輸液；應(yīng)用價(jià)值【中圖分類號(hào)】R573【文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)號(hào)】A【文章編號(hào)】2096-0867(2015)02-0144-02NursingriskmanagementapplicationvalueforpediatricscalpintravenousinfusionZHOUXiu-juan.DepartmentofPediatrics,People'sHospitalofDonghaiCountyJiangsuLi
4、anyungang222300【Abstract】Objective:!"。explorethenursingriskmanagementintheapplicationvalueofpediatricscalpintravenousinfusion.Methods:Selected352caseswithscalpintravenousinfusioninpediatricpatientsfromJanuary2013toDecember2014inourhospitalastheresearchobject.352
5、casesrandomlydividedintoobservationgroupandcontrolgroup,eachgroupof176casesofchildren.Controlgroupwithroutinenursing,theobservationgroupofchildrenwithnursingriskmanagementplanonthebasisofconventionalnursing.Comparedandanalyzedthetreatmenteffectintwogroupsofchild
6、ren,incidenceofriskevents,childrenandtheirfamiliestonursingsatisfaction.Results:Observationgroupwithpuncturesuccessrate99.43%(175/176),significantlyhigherthanthecontrolgroup88.64(173/176),fixedsuccessrate98.30%(156/176)significantlyhigherthanthecontrolgroup87.50
7、%(154/176),thedifferencesofthecomparisonwerestatisticallysignificant,P<0.05.Observationgroupwithrepeatedpuncturerateof2.84(5/176),significantlylowerthanthecontrolgroup10.23%(18/176),liquidleakageratewas0.57%(1/176),significantlylowerthanthecontrolgroup5.11%(9
8、/176),needlelossratewas1.70%(3/176),significantlylowerthanthecontrolgroup7.95%(14/176),thedifferencesofthecomparisonwerestatisticallysignificant,P<0.05.Conclusion:
