資源描述：
《刑法解釋的立場(chǎng)與方法》由會(huì)員上傳分享，免費(fèi)在線閱讀，更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在學(xué)術(shù)論文-天天文庫(kù)。
1、第三部分，刑法解釋的方法?！肮び破涫拢叵壤淦鳌?，刑法解釋方法就是正確、合理、有效解釋和適用刑法之“器”，是刑法解釋得以最終實(shí)現(xiàn)的工具。如何發(fā)現(xiàn)那些立法者具有特殊判斷的場(chǎng)合并依立法原意對(duì)其作出解釋，如何使客觀主義解釋論增強(qiáng)刑法的適應(yīng)力，使刑法與時(shí)俱進(jìn)，歸根結(jié)底都依賴于刑法解釋方法的具體運(yùn)用。在本部分，文章對(duì)刑法解釋的具體方法作出了分析，對(duì)刑法解釋方法的位階提出了自己的觀點(diǎn)：刑法解釋方法的位階如何，應(yīng)當(dāng)受制于刑法解釋的立場(chǎng)。在適用主觀主義解釋論的場(chǎng)合，沿革解釋具有較高地位，當(dāng)沿革解釋與文理解釋的結(jié)論沖突時(shí)，應(yīng)選擇沿革解釋的結(jié)論；在適用客觀主義解釋論的場(chǎng)合，擴(kuò)大解釋處于較
2、高地位，當(dāng)擴(kuò)大解釋與文理解釋的結(jié)論矛盾時(shí)，應(yīng)選擇擴(kuò)大解釋。關(guān)鍵詞：刑法解釋；主觀主義；客觀主義；折衷主義；方法2AbstractTheinterpretationofcriminallawisanewaswellasoldtheme.Itnotonlyaboutthevitalityofthecriminallaw,butalsorelatedtothelifeandlibertyofcitizens.Thisarticleisbasedonthetheoryofcriminallawandjudicialpractice,inthisarticle,theauthort
3、riedtoexplainthestandpointsandmethodsofcriminallawinterpretation.Thispaperisdividedintothreeparts:Thefirstpartintroducestheconceptofcriminallawinterpretation,thecorrectinterpretationofthedefinitionoftheconceptofcriminallawmustbeinterpretedintheproperdefinitionofthesubject,theobject,thepur
4、poseofthepremise.TheexecutoroftheinterpretationincludesboththeNPCanditsstandingcommittee,thesupremepeople'scourtandthesupremepeople'sprocuratorate,andanyotherorganizations,socialgroupsandindividuals.Theobjectofcriminallawinterpretationistheprovisionsofthecriminallaw,andthepurposeofwhichis
5、toexplorethetruemeaningofcriminallaw.Thus,interpretationofcriminallawisaminingactivitiesthroughwhichtheNPCanditsstandingcommittee,thesupremepeople'scourtandthesupremepeople'sprocuratorateandotherorganizations,socialorganizationsandindividualswilldocorrectlyapplicationofthecriminallaw.Thes
6、econdpartisthestandoftheinterpretationaboutcriminallaw,bymakingsomeanalysisaboutthetheoryofsubjectiveinterpretationandthetheoryofobjectiveinterpretation,theauthorpointoutthatbothofthetheorieshaveitsownrationality.Thelegislativeintentisexactlythatandtheobjectivismdoesn’tviolettheprincipleo
7、flegality.Thedisputeamongthetwotheoriesisaexaggeratedacademicdispute.Scholarsislackofexamples,stayintheargumenttheorycausedincompatibleforthem.Thisarticlebelievesthat,thepositionofcriminallawinterpretationproblemisthroughthisillusiontoseektheLord,andobjectiveinterpr
