does corporate lending by banks and finance companies differ evidence on specialization in

does corporate lending by banks and finance companies differ evidence on specialization in

ID:34520614

大?。?55.30 KB

頁數(shù):65頁

時(shí)間:2019-03-07

does corporate lending by banks and finance companies differ evidence on specialization in_第1頁
does corporate lending by banks and finance companies differ evidence on specialization in_第2頁
does corporate lending by banks and finance companies differ evidence on specialization in_第3頁
does corporate lending by banks and finance companies differ evidence on specialization in_第4頁
does corporate lending by banks and finance companies differ evidence on specialization in_第5頁
資源描述:

《does corporate lending by banks and finance companies differ evidence on specialization in》由會員上傳分享,免費(fèi)在線閱讀,更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在教育資源-天天文庫

1、DoesCorporateLendingbyBanksandFinanceCompaniesDiffer?EvidenceonSpecializationinPrivateDebtContractingMarkCareyMitchPostandStevenA.SharpeFederalReserveBoardJune6,1996Keywords:privatedebt,bankloan,financecompany,corporatedebtJELClassification:G20,G32Theviewsexpressedhereinare

2、theauthors’anddonotnecessarilyreflectthoseoftheBoardofGovernorsorthestaffoftheFederalReserveSystem.WewouldliketoacknowledgeexcellentresearchassistanceprovidedbyMargaretKyle.AddresscorrespondencetoMarkCarey,MailStop180,FederalReserveBoard,Washington,DC20551.(202)452-2784(voi

3、ce),(202)452-5295(fax),mcarey@frb.gov(email).1.IntroductionMuchoftherecentresearchonfinancialcontractingandintermediationfocusesonthedistinctionbetweenprivateandpublicdebtcontracts.Thecentralthemeofthisresearchconcernswhy,andtowhatdegree,privatemarketsuppliersofcreditarebet

4、tersuitedthanpubliccreditorstofinance“information-problematic”borrowers,orallbuttheleastriskyandwell-knownfirms.Privatemarketlendersarethoughttohavestrongerincentivesorgreaterabilitytomonitorborrowers(Diamond1984,1991;Fama1985),ortobebetterpositionedthanpubliccreditorstoren

5、egotiatecontracttermsorexercisecontrolrightsintheeventofaproblem(BerlinandMester1992;GortonandKahn1993).Inaddition,avaluedreputationenhancesprivatemarketlenders’abilitytomakecrediblecommitmentstoactingoodfaithshouldaborrowerexperienceproblems(ChemmanurandFulghieri,1994).Per

6、hapsmainlyforsimplicity,almostallstudiestodatehaveanalyzedgenericintermediariesandprivatedebt(“banks”and“bankloans”).Manyimportantquestionsariseincorporatefinanceandfinancialintermediation,however,ifdifferenttypesofbusinesslendersorprivatedebtcontractsarespecializedtodiffer

7、entborrowers,aspractitionersoftensuggest.Whydoesspecializationarise,andwhatcanbelearnedaboutprivatedebtingeneralbyanexaminationofit?Whichlendersandwhichtypesofprivatedebtshouldagivenborroweruse?Aredifferentcapitalorfundingstructuresoptimalforintermediarieswithdifferentlendi

8、ngspecialties?Howshoulddifferentkindsofprivatelendingberegulated,ifatall?Inwholesa

當(dāng)前文檔最多預(yù)覽五頁,下載文檔查看全文

此文檔下載收益歸作者所有

當(dāng)前文檔最多預(yù)覽五頁,下載文檔查看全文
溫馨提示:
1. 部分包含數(shù)學(xué)公式或PPT動畫的文件,查看預(yù)覽時(shí)可能會顯示錯亂或異常,文件下載后無此問題,請放心下載。
2. 本文檔由用戶上傳,版權(quán)歸屬用戶,天天文庫負(fù)責(zé)整理代發(fā)布。如果您對本文檔版權(quán)有爭議請及時(shí)聯(lián)系客服。
3. 下載前請仔細(xì)閱讀文檔內(nèi)容,確認(rèn)文檔內(nèi)容符合您的需求后進(jìn)行下載,若出現(xiàn)內(nèi)容與標(biāo)題不符可向本站投訴處理。
4. 下載文檔時(shí)可能由于網(wǎng)絡(luò)波動等原因無法下載或下載錯誤,付費(fèi)完成后未能成功下載的用戶請聯(lián)系客服處理。