資源描述：
《民法主觀題分析方法（analysis method of subjective questions in civil law）》由會(huì)員上傳分享，免費(fèi)在線閱讀，更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在教育資源-天天文庫(kù)。
1、民法主觀題分析方法（Analysismethodofsubjectivequestionsincivillaw）CivillawcaseanalysismethodTheauthorisengagedincivilandcommercialtrialworkinthepeople'scourtsatthebasiclevel,andtalksaboutasuperficialunderstandingofthecivillawcaseanalysismethods,combinedwiththediscussionofthescholarsconce
2、rned.Iusedtostudychemicalanalysisinschool,andIthinkitissimilartocasestudy.Firstofall,chemicalanalysisisqualitativeanalysis,thatistoanalyzethecompositionofthegoods,andthenquantitativeanalysis,thatis,determinethecontentofeachcomponent.Civilcaseanalysisalsohasasimilar"qualitative"
3、and"quantitative"".Aftertheplaintiffsuestothepeople'scourtandthecourtfilingdepartmentmakesaformalexamination,itconsidersthatitconformstotheconditionsforfilingthecaseandacceptsit.Thecaseisassignedtothepresidingjudge,andthecaseanalysisbegins.Asinthecaseofananalyticalsample,acasei
4、sreceived,firstofall,tohavearoughpictureofwhatthepartiesmaydisputeaboutthecaseandwherethefocusofthedisputeis.Then,afterthedefendanthassubmittedhispleadings,heorshecaninitiallysetupthepointofcontentionbetweenthetwoparties,andthroughtheexchangeofevidence,usetherulesofevidencetode
5、terminethelegalfacts.Thisisanalogoustoqualitativeanalysisinchemicalanalysis.Howtodealwithacaseisanalogoustoquantitativeanalysis.Withthesupportofmodernchemicalanalysistechnology,thesamesampleshouldbeanalyzedindifferentplaces,andtheconclusionshouldbeunique.However,foralongtime,in
6、theanalysisofcivilcaseinChinahasbeenthelackofastandardized,rigorousanalysismethodsandthinking,everyoneaccordingtotheirknowledge,thinkingtoanalyzethecase,alackofnormativeanalysismethod.Inpractice,thereareoftensomejudgestodeterminethefacts,andthenimagine,directconclusion,theninor
7、dertosupporttheconclusiontofindsomelegalbasis;somejudgment,thefactsareclear,theapplicablelawiscorrect,butnotapplicabletothefactsandlawareanalyzed,andwentstraighttothelackofreasoning;conclusionfromfacts,noreasoningprocess.Thesephenomenagenerallyexist,whichleadtothefactthatthelog
8、icsyllogismandthemethodofcivilhermeneuticscannotbewide
