資源描述:
《抑郁個(gè)體情緒加工與認(rèn)知控制的相互作用》由會(huì)員上傳分享,免費(fèi)在線閱讀,更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在教育資源-天天文庫。
1、中國心理衛(wèi)生雜志2010年第24卷第5期·神經(jīng)心理生物學(xué)研究·抑郁個(gè)體情緒加工與認(rèn)知控制的相互作用廖成菊馮正直。王鳳劉慶英黃賽(第三軍醫(yī)大學(xué)護(hù)理學(xué)院心理學(xué)教研室,重慶400038@通信作者E—mail:fzz@tnnTln.edu.ca)【摘要】目的:探討抑郁個(gè)體情緒加工與認(rèn)知控制的相互作用特點(diǎn)。方法:從重慶某兩所高校120名學(xué)生中,用Beck抑郁問卷和自評(píng)抑郁量表篩選出20名抑郁情緒個(gè)體和26名正常被試參與情緒干擾任務(wù)。結(jié)果:兩組被試在注視悲傷面孔時(shí)的正確率差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P=0.115),而在忽視悲傷面孔時(shí),抑郁情緒組的正確率低于正常
2、對(duì)照組[(0.69±0.19)vs.(0.81±0.15),P=0.030];兩組被試在注視高興面孔時(shí)的正確率邊緣顯著(P=0.062),而在忽視高興面孔時(shí)的正確率差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,抑郁情緒組的正確率低于正常對(duì)照組[(0.68±0.2O)vs.(0.80±0.17),P=0.033]。呈現(xiàn)時(shí)間為500ms時(shí)的正確率高于呈現(xiàn)時(shí)間為250ms和375ms時(shí)的正確率[(0.75±0.03)vs.((0.68±0.03),(0.69±0.02);均P<0.001],而呈現(xiàn)時(shí)間為250ms與375ms時(shí)的正確率差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P=0.950)。結(jié)論
3、:抑郁個(gè)體的情緒(不管正性還是負(fù)性)加工過程對(duì)認(rèn)知控制過程會(huì)造成干擾,其認(rèn)知控制功能可能受損;抑郁情緒個(gè)體的認(rèn)知控制功能受損可能會(huì)引起正性情緒加工能力下降,而對(duì)負(fù)性情緒加工沒有影響?!娟P(guān)鍵詞】抑郁情緒;情緒加工;認(rèn)知控制;相互作用;情緒干擾任務(wù)中圖分類號(hào):R749.4,B842.1文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼:A文章編號(hào):1000—6729(2010)005—0387—05doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000—6729.2010.05.018Interactionofemotionprocessingandcognitivecontrolinind
4、ividualswithdepressiveemotionLIAOCheng—Ju,F(xiàn)ENGZheng—Zhi,WANGFeng。LIUQing—Ying。HUANGSaiDepartmentofPsychology,CollegeofNursing。ThirdMilitaryMedicalUniversity,Chongqing400038。ChinaCorrespondingauthor,F(xiàn)ENGZheng—z,E—mail:@tmrnu.edu.cn【Abstract1Objective:Toexploretheinteraction
5、ofemotionprocessingandcognitivecontrolinindividualswithdepressiveemotion.Methods:Twentyparticipantswithdepressiveemotion(depressedgroup)and26normalcontrols(controlgroup)wereselectedwiththeBeckDepressionInventory(BDI)andSelf-ratingDepressionScale(SDS).Allparticipantscomplet
6、edtheemotion—interferencetask.Results:Therewasnosignificantdiffer-enceontheaccuraciesbetweenthedepressedgroupandthecontrolgroupwhenmeyattendedtothesadfaces(P=0.115).Whentheyignoredthesadfaces,theaccuraciesinthedepressedgroupweresignificantlylowerthanthatinthecontrolgroup【(
7、0.69±0.19)vs.(0.81±0.15)].Whentheyattendedtothehappyfaces。thedifferencebetweenthetwogroupswasmarginalsignificant(P=0.062).Vdhenthcyignoredthehappyfaces,theaccuraciesinthedepressedgroupwassignificantlylowerthanthatinthecontrolgroup【(0.68±0.20)vs.10.80±0.17);P=0.033].Theaccu
8、racieswiththestimulibeingpresentedfor500mswassignificantlyhigherthantheaccuracieswiththes