資源描述：
《抑郁個(gè)體情緒加工與認(rèn)知控制的相互作用》由會(huì)員上傳分享，免費(fèi)在線閱讀，更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在教育資源-天天文庫。
1、中國心理衛(wèi)生雜志2010年第24卷第5期·神經(jīng)心理生物學(xué)研究·抑郁個(gè)體情緒加工與認(rèn)知控制的相互作用廖成菊馮正直。王鳳劉慶英黃賽(第三軍醫(yī)大學(xué)護(hù)理學(xué)院心理學(xué)教研室，重慶400038@通信作者E—mail：fzz@tnnTln．edu．ca)【摘要】目的：探討抑郁個(gè)體情緒加工與認(rèn)知控制的相互作用特點(diǎn)。方法：從重慶某兩所高校120名學(xué)生中，用Beck抑郁問卷和自評(píng)抑郁量表篩選出20名抑郁情緒個(gè)體和26名正常被試參與情緒干擾任務(wù)。結(jié)果：兩組被試在注視悲傷面孔時(shí)的正確率差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P=0．115)，而在忽視悲傷面孔時(shí)，抑郁情緒組的正確率低于正常
2、對(duì)照組[(0．69±0．19)vs．(0．81±0．15)，P=0．030]；兩組被試在注視高興面孔時(shí)的正確率邊緣顯著(P=0．062)，而在忽視高興面孔時(shí)的正確率差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義，抑郁情緒組的正確率低于正常對(duì)照組[(0．68±0．2O)vs．(0．80±0．17)，P=0．033]。呈現(xiàn)時(shí)間為500ms時(shí)的正確率高于呈現(xiàn)時(shí)間為250ms和375ms時(shí)的正確率[(0．75±0．03)vs．((0．68±0．03)，(0．69±0．02)；均P<0．001]，而呈現(xiàn)時(shí)間為250ms與375ms時(shí)的正確率差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P=0．950)。結(jié)論
3、：抑郁個(gè)體的情緒(不管正性還是負(fù)性)加工過程對(duì)認(rèn)知控制過程會(huì)造成干擾，其認(rèn)知控制功能可能受損；抑郁情緒個(gè)體的認(rèn)知控制功能受損可能會(huì)引起正性情緒加工能力下降，而對(duì)負(fù)性情緒加工沒有影響?！娟P(guān)鍵詞】抑郁情緒；情緒加工；認(rèn)知控制；相互作用；情緒干擾任務(wù)中圖分類號(hào)：R749．4，B842．1文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼：A文章編號(hào)：1000—6729(2010)005—0387—05doi：10．3969／j．issn．1000—6729．2010．05．018Interactionofemotionprocessingandcognitivecontrolinind
4、ividualswithdepressiveemotionLIAOCheng—Ju，F(xiàn)ENGZheng—Zhi，WANGFeng。LIUQing—Ying。HUANGSaiDepartmentofPsychology，CollegeofNursing。ThirdMilitaryMedicalUniversity，Chongqing400038。ChinaCorrespondingauthor，F(xiàn)ENGZheng—z，E—mail：@tmrnu．edu．cn【Abstract1Objective：Toexploretheinteraction
5、ofemotionprocessingandcognitivecontrolinindividualswithdepressiveemotion．Methods：Twentyparticipantswithdepressiveemotion(depressedgroup)and26normalcontrols(controlgroup)wereselectedwiththeBeckDepressionInventory(BDI)andSelf-ratingDepressionScale(SDS)．Allparticipantscomplet
6、edtheemotion—interferencetask．Results：Therewasnosignificantdiffer-enceontheaccuraciesbetweenthedepressedgroupandthecontrolgroupwhenmeyattendedtothesadfaces(P=0．115)．Whentheyignoredthesadfaces，theaccuraciesinthedepressedgroupweresignificantlylowerthanthatinthecontrolgroup【(
7、0．69±0．19)vs．(0．81±0．15)]．Whentheyattendedtothehappyfaces。thedifferencebetweenthetwogroupswasmarginalsignificant(P=0．062)．Vdhenthcyignoredthehappyfaces，theaccuraciesinthedepressedgroupwassignificantlylowerthanthatinthecontrolgroup【(0．68±0．20)vs．10．80±0．17)；P=0．033]．Theaccu
8、racieswiththestimulibeingpresentedfor500mswassignificantlyhigherthantheaccuracieswiththes
