資源描述：
《論專利池濫用的反壟斷法規(guī)制》由會(huì)員上傳分享，免費(fèi)在線閱讀，更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在學(xué)術(shù)論文-天天文庫(kù)。
1、碩士專業(yè)學(xué)位論文論文題目論專利池濫用的反壟斷法規(guī)制研究生姓名王磊指導(dǎo)教師姓名曹博專業(yè)名稱法律碩士（法學(xué)）研究方向競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法論文提交日期2013年4月論專利池濫用的反壟斷法規(guī)制中文摘要論專利池濫用的反壟斷法規(guī)制中文摘要專利池是21世紀(jì)推動(dòng)知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的重要力量，當(dāng)專利池濫用行為造成排除限制競(jìng)爭(zhēng)效果或顯示危險(xiǎn)性時(shí)應(yīng)當(dāng)受到反壟斷法規(guī)制。按壟斷協(xié)議的類型可將專利池濫用行為分為橫向壟斷協(xié)議與縱向壟斷協(xié)議。橫向壟斷協(xié)議內(nèi)容包括在組建過(guò)程中非必要專利入池、限制專利權(quán)人經(jīng)營(yíng)自主權(quán)等；而縱向壟斷協(xié)議內(nèi)容包括拒絕許可、專利池搭售、交易歧視等可能造成反壟斷后
2、果的權(quán)利濫用行為。美國(guó)、歐盟和日本等國(guó)在反壟斷法規(guī)制專利池濫用方面積累了豐富的經(jīng)驗(yàn)。主要包括：反壟斷法或執(zhí)法指南中增加專門針對(duì)專利權(quán)或?qū)＠貫E用的規(guī)定；將限制性條款進(jìn)行分類以提高反壟斷的可操作性；以及明確抽象的合理原則的具體判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)等。雖然我國(guó)《反壟斷法》有關(guān)于規(guī)制知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的原則性規(guī)定，但是由于缺乏專利權(quán)和專利池濫用的專門規(guī)定，僅存的規(guī)定不足以規(guī)制這種濫用行為。因此，有必要在借鑒國(guó)外（地區(qū)）經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上，完善反壟斷法固有缺陷，制定專門針對(duì)專利池濫用的相關(guān)規(guī)定，同時(shí)還應(yīng)妥善解決與其他法律制度的適用競(jìng)合關(guān)系。關(guān)鍵詞：專利池濫用反壟斷
3、法規(guī)制作者：王磊指導(dǎo)教師：曹博IAbstractThetheoryofpatentpoolabuseruleswithanti-monopolyregulationThetheoryofpatentpoolabuseruleswithanti-monopolyregulationAbstractPatentpoolistheimportantforcetopromotethedevelopmentofknowledgeeconomyinthe21stcentury,whenthepatentpoolabuseruledoutrest
4、rictcompetitionorurgencyshouldbeunderantitrustlawregulation.Accordingtothetypeofmonopolyagreements,patentpoolabusebehaviorcanbedividedintohorizontalmonopolyagreementsandverticalmonopolyagreement.Horizontalmonopolyagreementsincludenecessarypatentpoolinginformingprocess,
5、thelimitedautonomyinoperationofthepatentholder,etc.;Theverticalmonopolyagreementsincluderefusedtolicense,patentpooltying,maintaintheresaleprice,tradediscriminationmaycauseantitrustconsequencesofbehavior.TheUnitedStates,theEuropeanUnionandJapanandothercountriesintheanti
6、-monopolylawregulateabuseofpatentpoolhasaccumulatedrichexperience.Mainlyincludes:theantimonopolylaworlawenforcementintheguideforapatentortheprovisionsofthepatentpoolabuse;Classifytherestrictiveclauseinordertoimprovetheantitrustoperability;Specificandcleartheabstractpri
7、ncipleofreasonablejudgmentstandards,etc.Theanti-monopolylawinourcountrylacksspecialprovisionoftheabuseofpatentpool,therefore,itisnecessaryonthebasisofusingtheexperienceofforeign(regional),consummateinherentlaw,formulatingspecialaccordingtorelevantregulationoftheabuseof
8、patentpool,atthesametime,itshouldalsoproperlyhandleforconcurrencerelationshipwithotherlegalsystem.Keywords:Patentpool
