資源描述:
《《茶之書(shū)》中英文對(duì)照 I 仁者之飲(徐恒迦譯)》由會(huì)員上傳分享,免費(fèi)在線(xiàn)閱讀,更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在教育資源-天天文庫(kù)。
1、TheBookofTea茶之書(shū)byKakuzoOkakura岡倉(cāng)天心(日)I.TheCupofHumanity仁者之飲Teabeganasamedicineandgrewintoabeverage.InChina,intheeighthcentury,itenteredtherealmofpoetryasoneofthepoliteamusements.ThefifteenthcenturysawJapanennobleitintoareligionofaestheticism--Teaism.Teaismisacultfoundedontheadorationofth
2、ebeautifulamongthesordidfactsofeverydayexistence.Itinculcatespurityandharmony,themysteryofmutualcharity,theromanticismofthesocialorder.ItisessentiallyaworshipoftheImperfect,asitisatenderattempttoaccomplishsomethingpossibleinthisimpossiblethingweknowaslife.茶,始于藥,而后為飲。在八世紀(jì)的中國(guó),茶就作為一樁雅事而進(jìn)入一個(gè)
3、詩(shī)意王國(guó)。而日本則在十五世紀(jì)將其尊崇為一種美的宗教——茶道。茶道,是在日常染污之間,因由對(duì)美的傾慕而建立起來(lái)的心靈儀式。茶道教人純凈和諧,理解互愛(ài)的奧義,并從社會(huì)秩序中開(kāi)發(fā)出浪漫情懷。它是一種溫柔的嘗試,試圖在我們所知的生命無(wú)窮盡的不可能中,來(lái)成就那些微小的可能,因而本質(zhì)上是對(duì)不完美的崇拜?!hePhilosophyofTeaisnotmereaestheticismintheordinaryacceptanceoftheterm,foritexpressesconjointlywithethicsandreligionourwholepointofviewabout
4、manandnature.Itishygiene,foritenforcescleanliness;itiseconomics,foritshowscomfortinsimplicityratherthaninthecomplexandcostly;itismoralgeometry,inasmuchasitdefinesoursenseofproportiontotheuniverse.ItrepresentsthetruespiritofEasterndemocracybymakingallitsvotariesaristocratsintaste.茶之哲學(xué),并非像
5、我們通常對(duì)此理解的那般僅是一種唯美的趣味,它同時(shí)融合倫理與宗教,表達(dá)了我們對(duì)于人類(lèi)與自然的全部見(jiàn)解。茶是保健學(xué),因它強(qiáng)調(diào)潔凈;茶是經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué),因它顯示了樸素中的舒適而非繁復(fù)昂貴的樂(lè)趣;茶是精神的幾何學(xué),因它定義了我們對(duì)于宇宙自然的分寸感。它使它的信仰者成為精神上的貴族,故而代表了東方民主的精髓。ThelongisolationofJapanfromtherestoftheworld,soconducivetointrospection,hasbeenhighlyfavourabletothedevelopmentofTeaism.Ourhomeandhabits,costu
6、meandcuisine,porcelain,lacquer,painting--ourveryliterature--allhavebeensubjecttoitsinfluence.NostudentofJapaneseculturecouldeverignoreitspresence.Ithaspermeatedtheeleganceofnobleboudoirs,andenteredtheabodeofthehumble.Ourpeasantshavelearnedtoarrangeflowers,ourmeanestlabourertoofferhissalu
7、tationtotherocksandwaters.Inourcommonparlancewespeakoftheman"withnotea"inhim,whenheisinsusceptibletotheseriocomicinterestsofthepersonaldrama.Againwestigmatisetheuntamedaesthetewho,regardlessofthemundanetragedy,runsriotinthespringtideofemancipatedemotions,asone"withtoomuch