Constructing and critiquing reflective practice 1反思實踐1的建構與批判

Constructing and critiquing reflective practice 1反思實踐1的建構與批判

ID:40848890

大小:158.53 KB

頁數(shù):20頁

時間:2019-08-08

Constructing and critiquing reflective practice 1反思實踐1的建構與批判_第1頁
Constructing and critiquing reflective practice 1反思實踐1的建構與批判_第2頁
Constructing and critiquing reflective practice 1反思實踐1的建構與批判_第3頁
Constructing and critiquing reflective practice 1反思實踐1的建構與批判_第4頁
Constructing and critiquing reflective practice 1反思實踐1的建構與批判_第5頁
資源描述:

《Constructing and critiquing reflective practice 1反思實踐1的建構與批判》由會員上傳分享,免費在線閱讀,更多相關內容在學術論文-天天文庫

1、EducationalActionResearchISSN:0965-0792(Print)1747-5074(Online)Journalhomepage:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/reac201ConstructingandcritiquingreflectivepracticeStephenNewman1Tocitethisarticle:StephenNewman(1999)Constructingandcritiquingreflectivepractice,EducationalActionResearch,

2、7:1,145-163,DOI:10.1080/09650799900200081Tolinktothisarticle:https://doi.org/10.1080/09650799900200081Publishedonline:20Dec2006.SubmityourarticletothisjournalArticleviews:9938Citingarticles:15ViewcitingarticlesFullTerms&Conditionsofaccessandusecanbefoundathttp://www.tandfonline.co

3、m/action/journalInformation?journalCode=reac20CRITQUINGREFLECTIVEPRACTICEEducationalActionResearch,Volume7,No.1,1999ConstructingandCritiquingReflectivePractice[1]STEPHENNEWMANHungerhillSchool,Doncaster,UnitedKingdomABSTRACTTheworkofthelateDonaldSch?nhasbecomeinfluentialintheeducat

4、ionofmanyprofessionals,includingteachers.Yet,untilrecently,comparativelylittleattentionhasbeenpaidtodifficultiesinSch?n’swork.ThisarticleattemptsacritiqueofSch?n’snotionofreflectionbyinterweavingphilosophicalconcernsandempiricalwork,andconcludesbysuggestingthatsuchacritiqueiscapab

5、leofbeginningtodescribeanewapproachtoreflectivepractice.IntroductionThenotionofreflectivepracticeinteachereducation,oftenusedinassociationwithavarietyofothertermssuchas‘reflection’,‘inquiry-orientatedteachereducation’,‘reflection-in-action’,‘teacherasresearcher’andsoon,hasbecome‘o

6、neofahandfulofapprovedpartylines’(Kagan,1992,p.43).OneofthemostwidelycitedauthorsinthefieldisDonaldSch?n.JustoneofmanypossiblereasonsforSch?n’spopularitymightbethat,asearlyas1954,hearticulatedwhathasnowbecomeagenerallyaccepteddistrustanddislikeofpositivism(Sch?n,1954).Indeed,onere

7、asonforSch?n’sgreatinfluenceinteachereducationmayresultfromhisclaimtohaveidentified‘anepistemologyofpractice’(Sch?n,1983a,p.49),whichavoidswhatSch?nconsideredthethreedichotomiesofthe,inhisview,prevailingpositivistepistemologyofpractice,namelytheseparationofmeansfromends,theseparat

8、ionofresearchfrompracticeandthese

當前文檔最多預覽五頁,下載文檔查看全文

此文檔下載收益歸作者所有

當前文檔最多預覽五頁,下載文檔查看全文
溫馨提示:
1. 部分包含數(shù)學公式或PPT動畫的文件,查看預覽時可能會顯示錯亂或異常,文件下載后無此問題,請放心下載。
2. 本文檔由用戶上傳,版權歸屬用戶,天天文庫負責整理代發(fā)布。如果您對本文檔版權有爭議請及時聯(lián)系客服。
3. 下載前請仔細閱讀文檔內容,確認文檔內容符合您的需求后進行下載,若出現(xiàn)內容與標題不符可向本站投訴處理。
4. 下載文檔時可能由于網絡波動等原因無法下載或下載錯誤,付費完成后未能成功下載的用戶請聯(lián)系客服處理。