資源描述：
《奈達(dá)翻譯理論的研究》由會(huì)員上傳分享，免費(fèi)在線閱讀，更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在工程資料-天天文庫(kù)。
1、奈達(dá)翻譯理論的研究：作為一個(gè)學(xué)者，教師，創(chuàng)新，和有影響力的理論家，奈達(dá)在“圣經(jīng)社會(huì)運(yùn)動(dòng)”的歷史上有著無(wú)與倫比的全球影響。感謝他和他的功能對(duì)等論，豐富和挑戰(zhàn)了圣經(jīng)翻譯和翻譯研究領(lǐng)域，令其成為一個(gè)令人激動(dòng)的研究領(lǐng)域和話題。但本文認(rèn)為，雖然奈達(dá)理論有其自身的弱點(diǎn)和局限性，但對(duì)這一理論有些誤會(huì)和誤解。 Abstract：Ascholar,teacher,innovator,andinfluentialtheoretician.NidaisverypossiblyunsurpassedinthehistoryoftheBibleSocietymovemen
2、tintermsofglobalimpact.Thankstohimandhisexplicationoffunctionalequivalencetranslation,theitations,therearesomemisunderstandingsandmisconceptionsconcerningNida’stheory. 關(guān)鍵詞：奈達(dá)理論；誤解；對(duì)等；讀者反應(yīng) Keyisunderstandings,equivalence,readers’response. []：H085.3[]：A []：1002-2139(2011)-19
3、-0152-02 ?、?Introduction EugeneNada’stheoryoftranslationdevelopedfromhisothe1940sonintajororesystematicapproachborroinologybothfromsemanticsandpragmaticsandfromNoamChomsky’sedtheoryofgenerative-transformationalgrammar(Chomsky1957,1965). Nida’stranslationtheoryhasbeenprevalen
4、tinChinaandundergoneadramaticandeventfulperiodoftthemid-1990stothepresent,Nida’stheoryeChinesetranslationscholars. ?、?CriticismandDenialofNida’sTheory Fromthemid-1990stothepresenttime,Nida’stheoryhasmetseverecriticismsandevendenials.Inthelate1990s,Nida’stheorypact”(1997),clai
5、medthatNidaadvocatedanextremedomesticatingtranslationmethodinhistheory.InLiu’svieuchconsiderationtothereaderofthetargetlanguage,theformoftheoriginalmessagedidnotmattermuch.LiuarguedthataccordingtoNida’stheorythemessagecouldbeaddedoromittedatessageaboutNida’stheory,istheseveres
6、t.Inhis“CulturalDifferencesandReader’sResponse:OntheNotionoftheReader’sEqualResponseProposedbyNida”(2000),playedasignificantrole.Inaddition,theBiblereadersmighthavethesameresponseinrespectofpeople’sbeliefinGod,butthereadersofliteraryittedly Nida’stheoryhasitsoisunderstandings
7、andmisconceptionsdoexistintheportancetotheroleofreadersofthereceptorlanguage,buthedoesnotmerelytake“readers’response”toevaluatetranslation.Inrevieisunderstandingthat“dynamicequivalence”isequivalentto“reader-responsetheory”inliterarycriticism. Inbrief,reader-responsecriticismh
8、astportance.Clearly,inreader-responsecriticism,theauthorityof
