資源描述：
《論專利搭售反壟斷規(guī)制》由會(huì)員上傳分享，免費(fèi)在線閱讀，更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在學(xué)術(shù)論文-天天文庫(kù)。
1、摘要隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化進(jìn)程的加快，國(guó)家問(wèn)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)主要集中在所謂“知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)”領(lǐng)域的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)，而知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)在知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)中的作用同益凸顯。發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家所構(gòu)筑的“知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)壁壘”使得某些關(guān)系到我國(guó)未來(lái)發(fā)展的主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)由于受到國(guó)J'l'Jm識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)尤其是專利權(quán)方面的限制而受挫，甚至可能困擾中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展。當(dāng)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與競(jìng)爭(zhēng)相聯(lián)系時(shí)，知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)行使中的問(wèn)題便主要?dú)w結(jié)為知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域的限制競(jìng)爭(zhēng)問(wèn)題，在理論上，就是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與反壟斷法的關(guān)系問(wèn)題。本文說(shuō)明了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與反壟斷法的關(guān)系：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)并非法定的壟斷權(quán)，其本身不具有壟斷的功能；它們之間不存在必然的沖
2、突關(guān)系。然而，即使知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)人正當(dāng)行使知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法中賦予的權(quán)利，也有可能產(chǎn)生限制競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的后果而受到反壟斷法的規(guī)制。本文將以涉及專利的搭售行為作為討論的中心，介紹專利商品與普通商品的搭售、專利的捆綁許可、專利聯(lián)營(yíng)及技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)涉及的專利搭售問(wèn)題。本文探討了針對(duì)專利搭售的反壟斷規(guī)制理論演進(jìn)、反壟斷法對(duì)專利搭售適用的一般原則、針對(duì)涉及專利的搭售在搭售行為認(rèn)定上的一些特殊問(wèn)題。本文還以創(chuàng)新的視角提出了“專利的非增效實(shí)施"這一概念，從技術(shù)分析的角度揭示了這種行為可能存在的真實(shí)目的——搭售。關(guān)鍵詞：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用專利搭售反壟斷法Abs
3、tractWiththespeedingupoftheeconomicglobalization，competitionamongnationsmainlyfocusesoncompetitioninthefieldofSO．called“KnowledgeEconomy”．a(chǎn)ndtheimportanceofIntellectualProperty(IP)inthecompetitionofknowledgeEconomyiSsteadilvincreasing．“IPbarriers’’constructe
4、dbydevelopednationsfrustratedsomepillarindustriesbearingonfuturedevelopmentofChinabecauseofsuchindustriesbeingrestrainedbyforeignIP,especiallypatents，thisevenmaypuzzlethegrowthofChineseeconomy．WhenIPandcompetitionintersects．issuesintheexerciseofIPrightsboild
5、owntotheissueofcompetitionrestraintinthefieldofIP．a(chǎn)nd．intheory。theissueoftherelationshipbetweenIPandantimonopolylaw．IPisn’taStatutoryMonopoly．IPinitselfhasnoMonopolyFunction．ThereiSnonecessaryconflictingrelationshipbetweenIPandantimonopolylaws．Sometimesevena
6、rightowner’SproperexerciseofrightsconferredbyIPlawsmayalsoproducecompetition．restrictiveeffects．a(chǎn)ndbegovernedbyantimonopolylaws．ThisarticleelaboratesTyingArrangementConcerningpatent，includingbundlingofpatentproductsandnon-patentproducts，patentpoolandstandard
7、，packagelicense．Thisdissertationelaboratestheevolutionofantitrustregulationtheoryforthepatenttying，thegeneralprinciplesappliedforthepatenttyingintheantitrustlaw越well叢somespecialproblemsinvolvedinthedeterminationofthepracticeofpatenttying．Moreover,thearticleb
8、ringsforwardanewconcept．“Theno．eriectapplicationofpatents”．Throughanalysesintheart．thearticlerevealsthepossiblerealmotiveofthisbehavior_1hetyingarrangement．Keywords：IntellectualProperty，Abuse，Pa
